Essay: In Praise of the Humble Comma
by Pico Iyer
The gods,
they say, give breath, and they take it away. But the same could be said --
could it not? -- of the humble comma. Add it to the present clause, and, of a
sudden, the mind is, quite literally, given pause to think; take it out if you
wish or forget it and the mind is deprived of a resting place. Yet still the
comma gets no respect. It seems just a slip of a thing, a pedant's tick, a blip
on the edge of our consciousness, a kind of printer's smudge almost. Small, we
claim, is beautiful (especially in the age of the microchip). Yet what is so
often used, and so rarely recalled, as the comma -- unless it be breath itself?
Punctuation,
one is taught, has a point: to keep up law and order. Punctuation marks are the
road signs placed along the highway of our communication -- to control speeds,
provide directions and prevent head-on collisions. A period has the unblinking
finality of a red light; the comma is a flashing yellow light that asks us only
to slow down; and the semicolon is a stop sign that tells us to ease gradually
to a halt, before gradually starting up again. By establishing the relations
between words, punctuation establishes the relations between the people using
words. That may be one reason why schoolteachers exalt it and lovers defy it
("We love each other and belong to each other let's don't ever hurt each
other Nicole let's don't ever hurt each other," wrote Gary Gilmore to his
girlfriend). A comma, he must have known, "separates inseparables,"
in the clinching words of H.W. Fowler, King of English Usage.
Punctuation,
then, is a civic prop, a pillar that holds society upright. (A run-on sentence,
its phrases piling up without division, is as unsightly as a sink piled high
with dirty dishes.) Small wonder, then, that punctuation was one of the first
proprieties of the Victorian age, the age of the corset, that the modernists
threw off: the sexual revolution might be said to have begun when Joyce's Molly
Bloom spilled out all her private thoughts in 36 pages of unbridled, almost
unperioded and officially censored prose; and another rebellion was surely
marked when E.E. Cummings first felt free to commit "God" to the
lower case.
Punctuation
thus becomes the signature of cultures. The hot-blooded Spaniard seems to be
revealed in the passion and urgency of his doubled exclamation points and
question marks ("Caramba! Quien sabe?"), while the impassive Chinese
traditionally added to his so-called inscrutability by omitting directions from
his ideograms. The anarchy and commotion of the '60s were given voice in the
exploding exclamation marks, riotous capital letters and Day-Glo italics of Tom
Wolfe's spray-paint prose; and in Communist societies, where the State is
absolute, the dignity -- and divinity -- of capital letters is reserved for
Ministries, Sub-Committees and Secretariats.
Yet
punctuation is something more than a culture's birthmark; it scores the music
in our minds, gets our thoughts moving to the rhythm of our hearts. Punctuation
is the notation in the sheet music of our words, telling us when to rest, or
when to raise our voices; it acknowledges that the meaning of our discourse, as
of any symphonic composition, lies not in the units but in the pauses, the
pacing and the phrasing. Punctuation is the way one bats one's eyes, lowers
one's voice or blushes demurely. Punctuation adjusts the tone and color and
volume till the feeling comes into perfect focus: not disgust exactly, but
distaste; not lust, or like, but love.
Punctuation,
in short, gives us the human voice, and all the meanings that lie between the
words. "You aren't young, are you?" loses its innocence when it loses
the question mark. Every child knows the menace of a dropped apostrophe (the
parent's "Don't do that" shifting into the more slowly enunciated
"Do not do that"), and every believer, the ignominy of having his
faith reduced to "faith." Add an exclamation point to "To be or
not to be . . . " and the gloomy Dane has all the resolve he needs; add a
comma, and the noble sobriety of "God save the Queen" becomes a cry
of desperation bordering on double sacrilege.
Sometimes,
of course, our markings may be simply a matter of aesthetics. Popping in a
comma can be like slipping on the necklace that gives an outfit quiet elegance,
or like catching the sound of running water that complements, as it completes,
the silence of a Japanese landscape. When V.S. Naipaul, in his latest novel,
writes, "He was a middle-aged man, with glasses," the first comma can
seem a little precious. Yet it gives the description a spin, as well as a
subtlety, that it otherwise lacks, and it shows that the glasses are not part
of the middle-agedness, but something else.
Thus all
these tiny scratches give us breadth and heft and depth. A world that has only
periods is a world without inflections. It is a world without shade. It has a
music without sharps and flats. It is a martial music. It has a jackboot
rhythm. Words cannot bend and curve. A comma, by comparison, catches the gentle
drift of the mind in thought, turning in on itself and back on itself,
reversing, redoubling and returning along the course of its own sweet river
music; while the semicolon brings clauses and thoughts together with all the
silent discretion of a hostess arranging guests around her dinner table.
read in In Short: A Collection of Brief Creative Nonfiction
No comments:
Post a Comment